Agenda gay

The term "gay agenda" or "radical gay agenda" has been used by members of the Christian right to demonize advocacy for lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBTQ) rights, [3] such as same-sex marriage and civil unions, LGBTQ adoption, recognizing sexual orientation as a protected civil rights minority classification, LGBTQ military. "Gay agenda" myths have coincided with a surge in anti-LGBTQ+ hate crimes and + proposed anti-LGBTQ+ bills.

Ignorance about centuries of LGBTQ+ activism may fuel myths that political wins. Agenda homosexual (también denominada agenda gay) es un término acuñado por algunos conservadores sociales en los Estados Unidos para hacer referencia a la supuesta existencia de un programa (oculto) de la comunidad LGBT cuyo objetivo sería incrementar la aceptación de sus postulados a través de políticas, de visibilidad en los medios de.

In a funny talk with an urgent message, LZ Granderson points out the absurdity in the idea that there's a "gay lifestyle," much less a "gay agenda." What's actually on his agenda? Being a good partner -- and being a good parent. The Gay Agenda Dear readers, I have interviewed two people in the LGBTQ+ community. A bisexual male, Chris.

And, a lesbian female, Jasmine. Below, I have their answers and my own brief commentary. What is the gay agenda?

"There's no such thing as the gay agenda." -Jasmine Here we have it, folks. Huge thanks go to my partner, Aaron Wilson, whose support of me, my work, and this project is rock solid. I would like to thank these scholars, activists, and authors—queers and straight allies alike—whose generous feedback helped to shape and strengthen the chapters in this book: Lee Airton, Michael Barron, Becky Bridgman, Ann Chinnery, Matthew A.

Thank you to political cartoonist Ben Sargent for generously and quickly! Putting two and two together, the claim was that Vancouver, and even Canada, would be destroyed by God if the Gay Games were to take place. Despite the dire warning, the event washeld in Vancouver in August More than two decades later, Vancouver remains a growing and thriving metropolis.

As a member of a fundamentalist Christian church at the time, I heard plenty of worryexpressed by fellow congregants in the leadup to the Gay Games. These sorts of rationalizations show that most followers do not hold the Bob Birches of the world accountable for their words. But rationalizations show more than lack of accountability.

I learned another significant lesson from the fundamentalist Christian responses to the Gay Games and especially from the paid public notice in the Vancouver Sun. As absurd as most people might think all of this to be, this is precisely how many religious and social conservatives continue to depict us. Apparently, along with the straight allies whom we have duped and ensnared into our schemes and plans for social engineering, we hold tremendous power not only over society, but also in politics, wars, weather events, and just about anything else.

If Christian activists such as Santorum are to be believed, God is specifically unleashing his wrath pronoun intended upon the United States because American society is increasingly more tolerant, if not accepting, of queers. Evidently, then, queers are supervillains with the power of superheroes. The claims of what we have wrought upon the earth magnify beliefs that operate not only among Christian activists but in the broader society.

For instance, how children should be raised is a site of continual contestation. In the s, Anita Bryant, Miss Oklahoma in and former celebrity spokesperson for the Florida Citrus Commission, successfully led a campaign to overturn a Dade County, Florida, ordinance that prohibited discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation.

Significantly, the political coalition was called Save Our Children. Over 30 years later, accusations of recruiting and molesting children continue as predictable political fare among Christian activists. He asserted that gay men spread AIDS by cutting people with special rings when people shake hands with them. Yet, their claims continue to have some political currency.

According to some activists, it is not enough that we want to be able to have consensual sex that is free from state regulation and criminal penalties, or that we have legislation that is designed to protect us from discrimination, prejudice, and bigotry. We want much more. According to Christian activists, then, our agenda, to put it bluntly, is to bring about the end of humanity because, of course, we cannot procreate without technological intervention or third-party involvement.

Sterile straight couples and those who opt to not have children are apparently not hell-bent on bringing about the end of human civilization. Only we are. Further, we are probably to blame for their sterility and their choice to not procreate in the first place.

the gay agenda planner

Of course we are. From the vantage point of religious zealotry, the gay agenda takes the shape of evil that is embodied by us in the guise of common, normal people with whom unsuspecting, God-fearing people and their children interact every day. We might teach your children at schools, we might be your co-workers and neighbors, we might serve your food in restaurants everywhere.

Queer people are out to change the world by demanding to be recognized in all levels of society as queers. As aptly indicated in the insightful political cartoon by Ben Sargent see Figure 1 , we will exploit the U.